Content: there are many good ideas on this paper and I think it catches the reader's attention, especially in the first part. I like the idea of the "margin of improvisation" in the course and your thoughts on "learning by doing". On the other hand, I found the second part (the second page) more difficult to follow, maybe because of the lack of paragraphing.

Organization: the paper is coherent, especially in the first part. The second page is one long paragraph which could be split in more shorter paragraphs. Moreover, the ending seems a bit abrupt; maybe you could add some sort of conclusion to sum it up.

Vocabulary and grammar: good, but there are many run-on sentences. Check punctuation.

Erica Buzzacarin

draft upload: Erica-Buzzacarin_Draft.doc

feedback: erica buzzacarin_peer revision.doc

feedback: Tania_Callari_feedback.doc

Content: I particularly liked that you deal with challenges you had to face during the course. The pictures of the PLE trees are very nice. Relevant introduction and conclusion.

Organization: the paper is coherent and has a good structure. The central paragraph (challenges and things I’ve learnt) could maybe be divided in two (one for challenges, one for things you’ve learnt).

Vocabulary: good, but some words need to be checked.

Grammar: good.

Erica Bergamin

FINAL DRAFT: ericabergamin_final.doc

draft upload:ericabergamin_draft.doc

feedback: Peer feedback_ericabergamin.doc

erica bergamin_peer revision.doc

Feedback 1

Content: I particularly liked the first part of your paper, where you deal with your PLE (nice idea to include the PLE map as well; it’s a pity it came out so small, though). On the other hand, the second part of the paper could be expanded.

Organization: very interesting introduction and good use of connectors, etc. Suggestion: the first two paragraphs could be joined.

Vocabulary and grammar: good.

Ilaria

draft upload: laria_draft.doc

feedback: ilaria_feedback.doc

Feedback of Ilaria.doc

Martina

draft upload:martina_draft.doc

feedback:Peer_feedback-Martina.doc

COMMENT_MARTINA.doc

Feedback 2

Content: I think you managed to cover all the most important points of the course: what we did, why it was useful, what you learned. There’s a relevant introduction, and the conclusion sums it all up.

Organization: the paper is coherent and has a good structure; the sentences follow a logical order. On the other hand, I feel there are maybe too many connectors—some could be taken out. Check punctuation (i.e. commas before so/because)

Vocabulary and grammar: both very good. Check prepositions.

Tania

draft upload: tania_callari_1st draft.doc

feedback: Peer comment_Tania.doc

Feedback_tania_callari.doc

Viola

draft upload: Viola Padovan_draft.doc

feedback: Feedback_Viola _Padovan.doc

feedback: tania_feedback.doc

Content: entertaining, amusing text which catches the reader's attention. It has a sort of fluent, "conversational" style which makes it very personal. I like the conclusion very much.

Organization: coherent paper. You could divide it into paragraphs if you wanted, but it is fine as it already is.

Vocabulary and grammar: good. Just one thing: some sentences are quite long. While this gives to the paper a "conversational" style which makes it personal, I felt almost "breathless" while reading it.

Page Information

1 year ago [history]
View page source
You're not logged in
Recent comments:
Martina Garbinato: Dear Sarah, I tried to upload my first draft, but the following message appeared: Quota exceeded. martina_draft.doc was not uploaded. What can I do? Cheers, tina
No tags yet learn more

Wiki Information

Update to PBwiki 2.0

An entirely new PBwiki experience, including folders and easier editing.

Convert Now for Free | Learn more

Interculture Wiki

BloggingEnglish

Alessandra Teso

Alessandra Peron

Alexandra

Alida

Elena Birolo