PEER FEEDBACK Group 1 (http://tulanepadova.pbwiki.com/ItaliaUSA_NorthSouth)

 

 

Contents and Organization

 

1. Does it do what it’s supposed to do? This would depend on whether or not there is an Introduction. If there isn't one, should there be one? Is there a table of contents? I noticed that you're working on your introduction and on the table of contents. So, the purpose will be clearly explained at the end. 
2. Is there a comparison or are there conclusions? There isn't any conclusion. I think that your topic should not have one, because it's quite difficult to compare two different historical phenomenos. Anyway, it would be better if you make sure if the conclusion have to be part of every wiki page. In this case, you could just summarize the differences between North and South.
3. What do you like about it? (be specific) I really like the use of maps and schemes.
4. Is there cohesion? Yes, I think so.
5. Is it relatively easy to read? If not, what could the writer do to make it easier for the reader? I had no difficulties in read your page, so I think it's easy to read.
6. Is there balance and parallelism? Yes, you write a very clear outline in your table of contents and there's parallelism between the part about America and that abour Italy.
7. Is referencing done correctly? I think that the references are correct. There's just the reference number 17 that should be corrected. There's just a link.
8. Are there parts that appear that they should be referenced, but are not? In the English part there're enough references. I think that the paragraph about "Storia della Lega" should be referenced as well.
9. Can you find any instances of plagiarism? No, I don't think there're istances of plagiarism. 
10. Are there enough links to outside sources? Yes, at this point there're 17 references to outside links. I think they are enough. 
11. Length - are the paragraphs too long? too wordy? I think paragraphs are long enough and not too wordy
12. Structure - is there a clear structure divided into paragraphs? Yes, there is
13. Is there any use of multimedia? Yes, there images and two videos from youtube.com

 

Language

 

1. Are there sentence fragments or any run-on sentences? The sentences are run-on and not too long.
2. Are the verb tenses used correctly? Yes, it seems to me that they're used quite correctly.
3. Are there words that need to be checked for spelling? I didn't notice any spelling mistake
4. Are the beginning of sentences and proper nouns capitalized? Yes, they are
5. Do sentences have appropriate ending punctuation? Yes, e cept maybe for the paragraph regarding The Alaskan Independence party, it seems to me that it lacks of commas.
6. Is internal punctuation (comma, colon, semicolon) used appropriately? Yes, generally it is used properly.
7. Are pronouns used correctly? Yes, they are. I didn't notice anythinh wrong.
8. Is the appropriate vocabulary used? Yes, I think so. The vocabulary is quite formal and therefore I believe it is appropriate for the topic developed in their wiki

 

 Create your own educational wiki!HelpPublic, not yet premium Privacy Policy RSS