Interculture Wiki / peer3a

Does it do what it’s supposed to do? This would depend on whether or not there is an Introduction. If there isn't one, should there be one? Is there a table of contents? The general impression is definitely good because this piece of writing achieves its aim. However, you should add a table of contents to make your project clearer and more complete.

Is there a comparison or are there conclusions? The comparisons are clear but we don't really see any conclusions.

What do you like about it? (be specific) The contents are well developed and we like the structuring of the text.

Is there cohesion? Yes

Is it relatively easy to read? If not, what could the writer do to make it easier for the reader? Maybe the first part of the text should have a different layout because it would be easier to read. We suggest that you restructure the paragraphing and use the bold function like you did in the following parts.

Is there balance and parallelism? Yes, because each topic is faced in the same way.

Is referencing done correctly?There are no references

Are there parts that appear that they should be referenced, but are not? Yes, the one about the Washington Post would need a bibliographic reference.

Can you find any instances of plagiarism? No

Language

Are there sentence fragments or any run-on sentences? No

Are the verb tenses used correctly? Yes

Are there words that need to be checked for spelling? No

Are the beginning of sentences and proper nouns capitalized? Yes

Do sentences have appropriate ending punctuation? Yes

Is internal punctuation (comma, colon, semicolon) used appropriately? Not always, please check the paragraph about the most popular sports

Are pronouns used correctly? Yes