Revision made by group 3
Contents and Organization
Does it do what it’s supposed to do? This would depend on whether or not there is an Introduction. If there isn't one, should there be one? Is there a table of contents?
The wikipage is very well done, there's no proper introduction but they made a clear list of all the aspects they want to analyse giving a clear idea of their topic. There's a table of contents too.
Is there a comparison or are there conclusions? There is a detailed comparison therefore the conclusion, which is missing, is not essential.
What do you like about it? (be specific) We really like the layout, there are many graphics that make the content more understandable and easy to read.
Is there cohesion? Yes
Is it relatively easy to read? If not, what could the writer do to make it easier for the reader? As we have already pointed out, the text is very clear and easy to read.
Is there balance and parallelism? Yes
Is referencing done correctly? Yes
Are there parts that appear that they should be referenced, but are not? No
Can you find any instances of plagiarism? No
Are there enough links to outside sources?Yes
Length - are the paragraphs too long? too wordy? The paragraphs are not too long.
Structure - is there a clear structure divided into paragraphs? Yes
Is there any use of multimedia? No
Language
Are there sentence fragments or any run-on sentences?No
Are the verb tenses used correctly? Yes
Are there words that need to be checked for spelling? No
Are the beginning of sentences and proper nouns capitalized? Yes
Do sentences have appropriate ending punctuation?Yes
Is internal punctuation (comma, colon, semicolon) used appropriately? Yes
Are pronouns used correctly? Yes
Is the appropriate vocabulary used?Yes
Create your own educational wiki!