Group 15 feedback to group 9 

Contents and Organization

 

Does it do what it’s supposed to do? This would depend on whether or not there is an Introduction. If there isn't one, should there be one? Is there a table of contents?

There is a table of content, it is probably more a division of work, it could be useful to read what it is the main aim of this page.

 

Is there a comparison or are there conclusions? 

It lacks a final comparison

What do you like about it? (be specific)

It is very accurate in its content

Is there cohesion?

Is it relatively easy to read? If not, what could the writer do to make it easier for the reader?

Probably there are many numeric data, which make it a bit hard to read, but of course theyare useful to explain the main ideas

Is there balance and parallelism?

Yes, Italian and American are very well balanced

 

 

Is referencing done correctly?

Are there parts that appear that they should be referenced, but are not?

Can you find any instances of plagiarism?

Referencs are very well done inside the text and also in the final list.

Are there enough links to outside sources?

Yes

Length - are the paragraphs too long? too wordy?

Structure - is there a clear structure divided into paragraphs?

Is there any use of multimedia?

The paragraphs are clearly structured, and as a good web page has a good number of link where you can find the detail of what is written

 

Language

 

Are there sentence fragments or any run-on sentences?

Are the verb tenses used correctly?

Are there words that need to be checked for spelling?

Are the beginning of sentences and proper nouns capitalized?

Do sentences have appropriate ending punctuation?

Is internal punctuation (comma, colon, semicolon) used appropriately?

Are pronouns used correctly?

Is the appropriate vocabulary used?

There are no problem of language, it is correct, and use a very good English, maybe the register is a bit formal, but the topic require a certain register.

 

PEER FEEDBACK GROUP 7 

 

 

Contents and Organization

 

Does it do what it’s supposed to do? This would depend on whether or not there is an Introduction. If there isn't one, should there be one? Is there a table of contents? The first impression is that it not clear what the aim of paper is. Maybe you should include a table of contents, so that your work appears more complete.

 

Is there a comparison or are there conclusions? There is a comparison, but we don't see conclusions (however, the paper is not finished yet).

 

What do you like about it? (be specific) The layout is pretty clear, although you should make the size and style uniform.

 

Is there cohesion? Yes

 

Is it relatively easy to read? If not, what could the writer do to make it easier for the reader? Yes, the paragraphs are well structured.

 

Is there balance and parallelism?Yes, although the Italian part should be developed a bit more. 

 

Is referencing done correctly? There are no references.

 

Are there parts that appear that they should be referenced, but are not? You should make reference to the website you used for the images.

 

Can you find any instances of plagiarism?No

 

 

Language

 

Are there sentence fragments or any run-on sentences? The last part has to be finished. 

 

Are the verb tenses used correctly? Yes

 

Are there words that need to be checked for spelling? No

 

Are the beginning of sentences and proper nouns capitalized? Yes

 

Do sentences have appropriate ending punctuation? Yes

 

Is internal punctuation (comma, colon, semicolon) used appropriately? Yes

 

Are pronouns used correctly? Yes

 

Is the appropriate vocabulary used?Yes

 Create your own educational wiki!HelpPublic, not yet premium Privacy Policy RSS